Deduction & Induction


In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches.
Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. We might begin with thinking up a theory about our topic of interest. We then narrow that down into more specific hypotheses that we can test. We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses. This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data -- a confirmation (or not) of our original theories.


Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a "bottom up" approach (please note that it's "bottom up" and not “bottoms up" which is the kind of thing the bartender says to customers when he's trying to close for the night!). In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.
These two methods of reasoning have a very different "feel" to them when you're conducting research. Inductive reasoning, by its very nature, is more open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. Deductive reasoning is narrower in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming hypotheses. Even though a particular study may look like it's purely deductive (e.g., an experiment designed to test the hypothesized effects of some treatment on some outcome), most social research involves both inductive and deductive reasoning processes at some time in the project. In fact, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that we could assemble the two graphs above into a single circular one that continually cycles from theories down to observations and back up again to theories. Even in the most constrained experiment, the researchers may observe patterns in the data that lead them to develop new theories.

Perception Speed (2nd Chapter)


Perceptual speed 
is the ability to quickly and accurately compare letters, numbers, objects, pictures, or patterns. in tests of perceptual speed the things to be compared may be presented at the same time or one after the other. candidates may also be asked to compare a presented object with a remembered object.

chapter 2 marketing


Chapter 2   Company and Marketing Strategy:
Partnering to Build Customer Relationships

1) Which of the following involves adapting a firm to take advantage of opportunities in its constantly changing environment?
A) long-range planning
B) short-range planning
C) media planning
D) strategic planning
E) annual planning
Answer:  D
Diff: 2               Page Ref: 38
Skill:  Concept
Objective:  2-1

2) When a firm develops and maintains a strategic fit between its goals and capabilities, it is performing ________.
A) mission planning
B) values planning
C) strategic planning
D) business-portfolio planning
E) operations planning
Answer:  C
Diff: 1               Page Ref: 38
Skill:  Concept
Objective:  2-1

3) Which of the following is the first step in strategic planning?
A) set objectives and goals
B) develop the business portfolio
C) define the company mission
D) plan marketing strategies
E) identify threats and weaknesses
Answer:  C
Diff: 1               Page Ref: 39
Skill:  Concept
Objective:  2-1